> Watching an interview where both participants are less than perfect challenges you to think for yourself. if both participants are dead wrong, how is that an

> Watching an interview where both participants are less than perfect challenges you to think for yourself. if both participants are dead wrong, how is that any good? i mean, would you take programming advice from two guys who have no experience in making actual software? does that actually force you to "think for yourself" or just cause other listeners with no experience to become misinformed, and those with real experience tear their hair out in frustration?