This Kotaku article is really trying to spread misinformation about this kind of model. The image shown in the article was not trying to imitate anyone, as the

This Kotaku article is really trying to spread misinformation about this kind of model. The image shown in the article was not trying to imitate anyone, as the author of the image stated https://twitter.com/illustrata_ai/status/1558559036575911936 https://twitter.com/illustrata_ai/status/1558559036575911936 (the artist's name was not in the prompt), it is only RJ Palmer who for no reason thought this was the case, the signature also does not even come close to the original as the model is not really trying to copy anything, the signature is like the rest of the image completely made up. Also, in the article you linked it states that there are programs to explicitly remove the signature, this is also not true. Articles like the one you posted are usually full of nonsense, written by people who don't really understand this kind of technology and I wouldn't use them as a source of any kind. RJ Palmer's reaction to the image in the article: "This literally tried to recreate the signature of Michael Kutsche in the corner. This is extremely fucked up", these people are good at creating controversy, even when it is based on facts that are not true.