4 ms·
>But our everyday reality using the computer does not feel empowering. You want to use the internet without being tracked? Almost impossible. Want to message a
by kmeisthax 4y ago
>But our everyday reality using the computer does not feel empowering. You want to use the internet without being tracked? Almost impossible. Want to message a friend? I hope you have read and agree to the WhatsApp Terms of Service and Privacy Policy. Want to install some software on your Apple device? It better be in the App Store. Perhaps you want to lend an Amazon eBook to your sister? Well you don’t actually own it, so you’ll have to ask Amazon.
>What happened? I thought computers were supposed to be empowering? In all the techno-euphoria of the 1980s, Brand and others did not consider the manufacturer’s intent: our everyday computers, tablets, and phones are consumer machines built for consumption. The personal computer was replaced by the consumer computer just as soon as it arrived.
No. This isn't one thing. Three things happened concurrently:
1. Networked services
2. Malware
3. Copyright maximalism
The first trend is close to the "consumer computer" concept, since it's basically the old mainframe business model warmed over. However, the other two trends greatly accelerated the handcuffing of users.
Copyright maximalists feared the scourge of casual piracy and wanted to ban consumers from having access to copying technology. They failed, but Congress let them have protections for DRM that effectively amounted to being able to opt-out of being copied. They also sued and lobbied for intermediary liability on network services, requiring that they effectively do on-demand content removal.
Malware did exist in the mainframe era but it was mainly prank programs. Personal computing dramatically extended its reach. Proprietary software vendors were able to condition users to execute programs they could not inspect or modify. They also attempted to prevent copying with DRM, but an active cracking & piracy scene stymied that. So people were now blindly executing modified applications, often times with obfuscation to prevent removal of cracktros[0]. Pranksters used and abused this to distribute malicious code along with their software.
Network services made malware worse, too. The point of entry for malware in the Don't Copy That Floppy era was infected disks; and the solution was to write programs to detect and erase them. But with the Internet, everyone can connect to your machine, and it turns out that not only creates an entirely new class of software vulnerability to spread malware with, but a new motive for doing so - exfiltrating information and reselling it.
So you have three cycles running together that has made actually exercising anything resembling "freedom" into a scary ordeal. Computers just "get sick" with "viruses" and start stealing your information, so people rush to centralized services, upon which copyright maximalists have demanded control over and largely gotten it. "Consumer computers" are not (entirely) conspiracy of big tech to control our lives, but an act of convergent evolution under particular pressures.
[0] Object analysis complete. Target is a Space Pirate Crate. Space Pirates, strangely, dislike theft. The only way into their crates is through use of force.
- schmudde 4y ago> Proprietary software vendors were able to condition users to execute programs they could not inspect or modify. They also attempted to prevent copying with DRM, but an active cracking & piracy scene stymied that. So people were now blindly executing modified applications. Interesting analysis. But free software is demonstrably more secure. Are you claiming that proprietary vendors intentionally mislead people with FUD? Or was it a cultural zeitgeist in the era of shrinkwrap and slow telecom where free software was simply harder to find? i.e. it’s hard to experience more secure software if you can’t find it.
- LtWorf 4y ago> Are you claiming that proprietary vendors intentionally mislead people with FUD? They don't? They want to sell as much as possible. Customers are in general not allowed to know their internal practices. Audits are short and shallow.
- kmeisthax 4y agoIt is a cultural thing but not exactly how you describe. Back then nobody expected Free Software to have a security benefit. That was actually the argument for proprietary software: we'll sell you a blob you can't legally or technically modify, and in exchange we will support the software[0]. Proprietary software was supposed to be superior in quality to Free, because the companies making it had the financial power of the copyright monopoly backing them and legal penalties for selling substandard code. Early FOSS projects imitated the development processes of proprietary with small core teams of hackers only releasing "finished" code as physical media. The first GNU releases were sold on backup tapes, for example. The modern "bazaar" style of having in-progress development done in the open and accepting patches happened later with Linus Torvalds and Linux. This is an artifact of both culture and technology: you have to both be willing to accept and review unsolicited patches and be "online" enough to where this makes sense as your primary development process. That's where you start getting the whole "if everyone can read the code then bugs can get fixed faster" argument that OSI pushed. Concurrently with this, the personal computer market switched from "here's a BASIC interpreter, a manual, and some type-in programs, go nuts" to packaged shrinkwrap software. Free Software really did not exist in the personal computing world; the closest was "public domain" software which often did not come with source and is more akin to what we'd now call "freeware" - zero cost but not a FOSS project. Computer users at the time did not care about the license, or security, and would copy and execute anything they could because nobody had poisoned the well yet. [0] This is still an oversimplification. IBM pushed for proprietary software as a way to head off antitrust concerns, since beforehand they sold source-available software packaged with mainframe hardware.