3 ms·
that's quite a screed you wrote there. you must feel very strongly about it. amazon has made the choice to exclude ISIS flags, and exact copies of nazi flags, s
by walrus01 4y ago
that's quite a screed you wrote there. you must feel very strongly about it. amazon has made the choice to exclude ISIS flags, and exact copies of nazi flags, so it's curious why one is allowed and not the other.
your position seems to be from the free-market/libertarian angle that people can print and publish anything they want, sure, okay, whatever... the logical conclusion of this in the free market is that amazon as a private entity is also able to pick and choose what products they choose to sell and associate with their brand name.
- nobody9999 4y ago>that's quite a screed you wrote there. you must feel very strongly about it. amazon has made the choice to exclude ISIS flags, and exact copies of nazi flags, so it's curious why one is allowed and not the other. Which is their prerogative. And fine with me. Not that I have any say in the matter. As for whether I "feel very strongly" about such things, that's not so relevant, IMHO. What is relevant is that morality is not a team sport. It's individuals making moral choices. Whether we agree or disagree with those choices is also an individual thing. >your position seems to be from the free-market/libertarian angle that people can print and publish anything they want, sure, okay, whatever... the logical conclusion of this in the free market is that amazon as a private entity is also able to pick and choose what products they choose to sell and associate with their brand name. That's not how I would phrase it, but essentially correct.
- BrotherBisquick 4y agoah, but can we still buy flags representing the incorruptible, stable, and competent government of pre-2021 Afghanistan?
- pessimizer 4y agoIf you refer to things people say that you disagree with as "screeds," they'll eventually stop talking to you.
- nobody9999 4y ago>If you refer to things people say that you disagree with as "screeds," they'll eventually stop talking to you. A fair point. Although I expect you'd be just as effective if you'd just catted it to /dev/null. I'll paraphrase what I said in my original comment: "Just because you don't agree with the ideas presented by others, it doesn't mean that those others are angry and their presentation of such ideas is a 'screed'." That some folks don't get that is unfortunate, but not all that unexpected.