4 ms·

Yes, that’s basically what a plasma TV is.

• jagger27 4y ago
  Oh neat, I didn't realize that. I guess it didn't work out very well.
  • AdamH12113 4y ago
    I have a plasma TV that I use for gaming (Panasonic Viera). It's a great display with none of the contrast or ghosting disadvantages of an LCD, but it's heavy, delicate, and most importantly, it puts out a ton of heat. A plasma TV is basically a grid of tiny neon lights. Like any active display (CRT, plasma, or OLED) it can suffer from burn-in, but I haven't found that to be a problem for my usage.
    • mikestew 4y ago
      Between a very old Panasonic Viera 42" upon which a buttload of Halo was played over many years, and the current Samsung Not-Smart Plasma which gets a bit less game play, I've yet to see the slightest hint of burn-in. I did get some ghosting on the Panny before I sold it, but I otherwise take plasma burn-in to be an artifact from TVs made twenty years ago.
      • bzzzt 4y ago
        It's a problem with every plasma TV ever made. I've got one of the last Panasonic Viera's which, after almost 10 years, has a slight dark patch around the place where subtitles tend to appear (I'm from the Netherlands where almost all non-dutch content is subtitled) It's only really noticeable when looking at a uniform gray screen which is not my content of choice, but it's there.
  • onemoresoop 4y ago
    Plasma TVs are out there and have advantages and disadvantages to LCDs.
  • deleted 4y ago
    [deleted]
  • deleted 4y ago
    [deleted]
• jhallenworld 4y ago
  Also there was going to be field emitter (FED and SED) flat screen TVs, basically an array of electron guns. But they were killed by the low cost of LCDs: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Field-emission_display https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Field-emission_display https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Surface-conduction_electron-emitter_display https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Surface-conduction_electron-em...