5 ms·
>there's no "specialized" NSFW content maker to be highlighted Unless I'm misunderstanding you, yes there is, and it was even posted on HN last week: https://
by LordDragonfang 4y ago
>there's no "specialized" NSFW content maker to be highlighted
Unless I'm misunderstanding you, yes there is, and it was even posted on HN last week:
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=32572770 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=32572770
(And yes, many of its results are horrifying)
- GaggiX 4y agoNo, this is just Stable Diffusion without any modification, no fine-tuning is needed to create nudes.
- yarg 4y agoStable diffusion trained on a nude-free data set might struggle somewhat.
- lordswork 4y agoGoes without saying, but enthusiasts are working on it and making progress. Here's a quote from a discussion on it yesterday: as far as I am aware, I may have the only semi-tuned nsfw model, though it's not all that great. There are a lot of concepts that SD needs to learn, and they're difficult to teach. It's very likely that by the time I get something usable, it's going to destroy all of the other concepts. @<another_user> also has a fine tuned model, but it's only tuned on generating closeups of female genitals. If that's all you want to generate, then he's produced some really good results. As for distribution, I wouldn't know where to begin, considering the model is 11GB