> There is nothing stopping you from using additional random class names Congratulations on arriving at the realization that matches exactly what I wrote out i

> There is nothing stopping you from using additional random class names Congratulations on arriving at the realization that matches exactly what I wrote out in my first message. That you can include both was my entire thesis, dude! That you missed that and feel that "single-minded"[1] is an attack[2] explains the conflict here. You're reading things out of comments that aren't actually written there[3] and failing to read out of them what actually is. I'm glad that this exchange is over. 1. <https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/single-minded https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/single-minded>: Intensely focused and concentrated on purpose, thinking of only one goal, undistractable. 2. Are you perhaps mistaking it with "small-minded"? 3. That stuff, along with being able to "make a difference to search engines" mentioned, once again. Why? To reiterate—in response to what, exactly? Who are you arguing with?