4 ms·
Firefox did it because of security/performance concerns. Being able to customize UI doesn't lend itself to easy refactoring. In order to compete with Chrome mo
by Ygg2 4y ago
Firefox did it because of security/performance concerns. Being able to customize UI doesn't lend itself to easy refactoring.
In order to compete with Chrome most of XUL extensions had to go.
Hyrum's law in practice.
- encryptluks2 4y ago> Firefox did it because of security/performance concerns Isn't that the same concerns used in pushing Mv3?
- Ygg2 4y agoXUL was a legacy system and it was blocking many optimization/refactors. Does Mv2 really hold Chrome back?