5 ms·
I agree with all your points. Still, countering them: - If it's stressful it's probably not a good idea to speed in the first place. I.e. don't go fast if you'
by darklajid 15y ago
I agree with all your points. Still, countering them:
- If it's stressful it's probably not a good idea to speed in the first place. I.e. don't go fast if you're not feeling safe.
- Granted, but then again I'm not convinced that I'm very, very evil (if you talk about being green) or wasteful (if you talk about saving money) if I go 240 and use 9l/100km if there's someone driving a Dodge Ram with 130 on the right lane. In addition I consider this a limitation of technology, that might/could/should(?) go away w/ time and incentives to the industry.
- Depending on the distance I'd agree. I'd argue that I'd be a lot faster on a 400-500km route, but for the ~usual~ trips it doesn't matter much.
On the other hand, if the argument really boils down to 'let's get reasonable fast and safe to X while saving energy and removing the individual factor of going there in different ways': Might I suggest to look into trains for that usecase? They are actually quite good in DE and outrun cars/using the Autobahn in a number of cases. Public transportation vs. individual forms of travel.
- arethuza 15y agoI wouldn't say that I was aware of being stressed by driving before - but I'm definitely less tired driving than I used to be. Now I just chug along at the speed limit, listening to a decent audiobook.... Also I inevitably do a lot of driving up and down the UK A9 - which is a scenic but rather horrible and notoriously dangerous road.