I think he's a manipulative asshole. He's a one trick pony who picks a random group, makes false claims about what they believe, which are obviously wrong, and

I think he's a manipulative asshole. He's a one trick pony who picks a random group, makes false claims about what they believe, which are obviously wrong, and then invites the reader to feel smarter than his target group by pointing out why the obviously wrong idea is wrong. Bullshit along the lines of: Did you know statisticians believe the normal distribution curve is infallible and perfectly describe real world scenarios? This actually false. Therefore, statisticians are stupid, and you're smarter than them for understanding otherwise. And I am smarter than everyone for having pointed it out. He doesn't force you to examine your own biases and assumptions. He tricks you into believing that you have done so and have come out wiser. He's just yet another fool and fraud in a pit of fools and fraud.