3 ms·
Nope! It implies that yes, someone should think of the credulous people. I don’t believe censoring Rogan is justified/wise/useful/etc. — even if it were it’d s
by ethanbond 4y ago
Nope! It implies that yes, someone should think of the credulous people.
I don’t believe censoring Rogan is justified/wise/useful/etc. — even if it were it’d still be illegal anyway. But does that mean I think we should just throw credulous folks to the wolves with snarky remarks like “won’t someone think of the credulous people?!”
We should think of the credulous people, and take society’s threats against them and their threat to society seriously.