> Estimate the age of child users with a reasonable level of certainty appropriate to the risks that arise from the data management practices of the business or

> Estimate the age of child users with a reasonable level of certainty appropriate to the risks that arise from the data management practices of the business or apply the privacy and data protections afforded to children to all consumers I'm hearing that as "wave a magic wand that costs way too much per shake and hope the magic is strong enough that you don't get sued in one of three different ways." It gets even more abiguous: > Configure all default privacy settings provided to children by the online service, product, or feature to settings that offer a high level of privacy, unless the business can demonstrate a compelling reason that a different setting is in the best interests of children. How are we defining "high level of privacy?" The text seems to imply just the "highest setting you have available." And all of this hinging on if a child is "likely" to access the service in any way.