4 ms·
There's no incentive to respond to this sort of thing. If Cloudflare changes their policy, they'll just start publishing the other set of articles, claiming the
by nitwit005 4y ago
There's no incentive to respond to this sort of thing. If Cloudflare changes their policy, they'll just start publishing the other set of articles, claiming they're an unjust or unfair censor.
- a_shovel 4y agoThe incentive for dropping a stalking and harassment site from their service is the opportunity to stop providing the services a stalking and harassment site needs to function. Most humans have a sense of morality that influences their actions, which would make this opportunity highly appealing.
- viraptor 4y agoThey have multiple incentives: (ignoring the main "not being shitty people" incentive) - if they get investigated in the future in connection with some crime, they can't claim they weren't aware people use their service explicitly to protect illegal behaviour - they likely don't get as much money from KF as they lose in both other customers leaving and bad PR - many tech people will actively advertise against using them and will never consider working for them - by protecting KF, they invite more sites like that - and you really don't want to be known as "that service provider where you can go when nobody else wants anything to do with you" - the backlash is pretty established now, you really don't want comments on your feature announcements to start with "have you got a feature to turn off the murders yet?"