4 ms·
Good. A utility shouldn't be in the thought-policing business. If something illegal is going on, that's what law enforcement is for.
by georgia_peach 4y ago
Good. A utility shouldn't be in the thought-policing business. If something illegal is going on, that's what law enforcement is for.
- viraptor 4y agoThey are doing policing though, just the other way. Cloudflare successfully blocked taking the harassers to trial. Their lawyers blocked engagement of law enforcement against the right person in the first place.
- georgia_peach 4y ago> successfully blocked taking the harassers to trial Source please. They are still a US company, and must comply with all lawful requests.
- viraptor 4y agohttps://twitter.com/stealthygeek/status/1485731108822077443 https://twitter.com/stealthygeek/status/1485731108822077443 + context before/after in the thread. You'll find the link to the case documents there as well.
- georgia_peach 4y agoLaw enforcement blew him off. That's a civil suit. Filing a motion to quash on a subpoena is within their legal rights. The FBI won't do its job, so cloudflare should do it for them?
- unmole 4y agoThis makes no sense whatsoever. Cloudflate doesn't control the legal system.