4 ms·
See the part of the article starting at “We’ll first start with iso (like-for-like) comparisons between Ryzen generations, with iso-power.” That shows “up to +3
by chrismorgan 4y ago
See the part of the article starting at “We’ll first start with iso (like-for-like) comparisons between Ryzen generations, with iso-power.” That shows “up to +37%” at 105W.
- joshvm 4y agoThis is true, but there can be advantages to having 32 cores over 16, depending on your workload.
- chrismorgan 4y agoI’m not sure what you’re saying. Both the 5950X and the 7950X are 16 cores/32 threads.
- joshvm 4y agoSee my original post. I have an SFF case with a water-cooled 5950X+3090. That's already borderline for noise and thermals on a 240mm radiator, so an extra 100 W for the 7950X would probably be untenable. But as people point out - more perf per watt would probably mean cooler performance in a lot of workloads. It'll be interesting to see what the ITX options are for AM5 anyway.