The article almost gets to this point when they touch on the idea that "People still play Chess even though people can't win against computers" but 1) People d

The article almost gets to this point when they touch on the idea that "People still play Chess even though people can't win against computers" but 1) People don't do things just because it means a Job for them 2) New Jobs will be created to work through the vacuum left by new Tech 2.B) We'll sooner-or-later have to grasp with a different conceptualization/organization of how we allocate the resources for human life (Food, Shelter, Community)... or else. (Apply this sentiment for anything we can do to earn our livelihoods, Art is not exceptional in this regard) I see technologies like Dall-e being GREAT for capital A Art, in that I wholeheartedly believe our current system Art is worse-off than it otherwise could be. If 'Artist' stopped being a 'job', that'd be a good thing. The more 'Work' we eliminate from human life the closer we get to a place where our hand is forced to change, and in my view, for the better.