4 ms·
meanwhile after 20 years, foobar2000 only gets better with each release. I even still use (the Windows version) on my Mac thanks to Wine. The memory footprint o
by babypuncher 4y ago
meanwhile after 20 years, foobar2000 only gets better with each release. I even still use (the Windows version) on my Mac thanks to Wine. The memory footprint of Music.app when I load a large playlist is an order of magnitude greater than that of foobar2000 despite all the overhead that comes with Wine.
- colechristensen 4y agoI'm sure it's just a matter of taste, but I never liked foobar2000 despite hearing from people who loved it for a very long time.