Get over yourself buddy. I was very clear about my position and even acknowledged that it was plausibly a semantic debate: >To me asking if AI generated images

Get over yourself buddy. I was very clear about my position and even acknowledged that it was plausibly a semantic debate: >To me asking if AI generated images are copyrighted implies the latter issue. If you're trying to answer a different question it's just an uninteresting semantic debate. I think it is important to note that works by the ai are not inherently copyrighted, and they certainly aren't copyrighted to the ai. It is different to by copyrightable. It's ok if you think that's not a meaningful distinction. But I explained it multiple times and you didn't get it. > it looks like that is your modus operandi judging from past posts. Looks like yours is get tilted over nothing