> edit: it was in fact PragerU (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PragerU https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PragerU) which is intended for entertainment. It should not

> edit: it was in fact PragerU (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PragerU https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PragerU) which is intended for entertainment. It should not be considered reliable or unedited. Isn't PragerU a far right site know for promoting bizarre things? I'd would definitely call it "unreliable".