4 ms·
> The only impact on the I noticed That's probably more about what you pay attention to than the actual impacts. > If a private solution can do a better job t
by arrosenberg 4y ago
> The only impact on the I noticed
That's probably more about what you pay attention to than the actual impacts.
> If a private solution can do a better job than public transportation
I just explained why it didn't - the price point was completely based on private subsidy. I live in an urban area of a major city, and there are times and areas where it takes 30+ minutes to get a ride, including a few months ago when I was maybe 10 minutes from the international airport at a reasonable hour (~10PM). Busses and trains have schedules which are fairly reliable. They run late sometimes, but there is a pretty reasonable guarantee that they will show up. They won't cancel after 10 minutes, the muni is ADA complaint, and will only cost you $2.50 to get within a few blocks of your destination. Yes, buses have a coverage problem in the suburbs, but my suburban relatives (who love ridesharing) have also been complaining about the price and availability the last 12 months, so it doesn't seem like Uber/Lyft are able to fill the last-mile niche reliably at this point anyways.
- xnx 4y agoPublic transportation is also heavily based on subsidies. The ticket price only covers a fraction of the cost.
- arrosenberg 4y agoPublic transportation is a service, not a business meant to run a profit. I don’t mind subsidies when the public pays for its own stuff.