3 ms·
This brings me back to my childhood and building web pages when JavaScript elements to add whimsy and whatnot to the page. Was it particularly attractive? No.
by filmgirlcw 4y ago
This brings me back to my childhood and building web pages when JavaScript elements to add whimsy and whatnot to the page.
Was it particularly attractive? No. Was there much function (except for a few screen types and maybe cursor styles, not really). Was it fun and did it make the internet feel exciting and like a truly new and unique medium? Hell yes.
Love seeing this stuff preserved.
And add me to the list of people that now misses skeuomorphism from the aughts and the Delicious Generation of Mac apps. Lickable icons and interfaces. I still love them, mostly because it reminds me of when software had personality.
That’s the thing about the late-90s to early 2000s web aesthetic: it had personality.
I love stark and clean Swiss-influenced designs as much any anyone else. But software, websites, and hardware was always best when it had personality.
- leokennis 4y agoI think all design trends point to us having passed the peak of “flat” design. For example I think iOS is a big trendsetter and it’s less flat and boring than a few years ago (however still too white and boring).
- checkyoursudo 4y agoI would sometimes not get apps that didn't have good enough skeuomorphised icons. Like, if you're a flashlight app that can't even convince me you're a flashlight app then pfft begone.
- simondotau 4y agoEntirely valid. In a world where our phones have a hundred apps on them, the clarity of its icon is a truly important feature, especially for infrequently used utility apps.