3 ms·
I didn't have any particular expectation when I opened up this link, but because I was curious about the authors I clicked on one and found they had also publis
by evmar 4y ago
I didn't have any particular expectation when I opened up this link, but because I was curious about the authors I clicked on one and found they had also published one titled:
"Evidence for a connection between coronavirus disease-19 and exposure to radiofrequency radiation from wireless communications including 5G"
Which I guess in some sense might also possibly be true, but I gotta say it's a pretty bad opening sign.
- pbasista 4y ago> in some sense might also possibly be true The article you cited mentions "evidence". If there was indeed "evidence", we would know it for a fact. These articles merely try to attract facts-ignoring audience to which they can then spread misinformation that cannot easily be disproved. While these people are busy theorizing about the plausibility of the suggested idea, they are easily manipulated. The reason is that they would only be trusting the misinformation spreaders because only their opinions would be compatible with their understanding of the world. It is, unfortunately, as simple as that. Create misinformation that cannot possibly be disproved. Spread it out. Watch as people waste years coming with crazy constructions of hypothetical worlds where whatever you claim might potentially be true. Profit off of their stupidity by having huge influence on their opinions. Rinse and repeat. This is how Putin's propaganda works. And this is also how Trump's lies work.