If regulation is the answer, I'd hope it is designed with the restraint that Madison had: only guarantee the deepest and most fundamental rights. It should not

If regulation is the answer, I'd hope it is designed with the restraint that Madison had: only guarantee the deepest and most fundamental rights. It should not rule out the ability to use error-prone systems at all, at most it could restrict their use for the most severe consequences like broad account bans. Google can and should be reducing the scope of their automated action. I think error-prone systems are still necessary today to reduce costs to a tolerable modern level. I'm not inclined to throw out the baby with the bathwater regarding communication costs for the same reason I don't want $300 toasters even if "they don't make 'em like they used to". A good example is something that Facebook does: they have a blacklist of domains you can't send on Messenger, the message will be instantly blocked when you paste a detected link. From experience, this list is fairly large and very inaccurate, but the false positives for this system are annoying rather than catastrophic because all it does is block a specific message. If you don't like this, then you can use Signal or something, I don't want other people making that choice for me.