2 ms·
mercury is a bad example since it is lifetime-accumulative .. my reaction to this discussion is that not enough regard is held for odd or extreme living conditi
by mistrial9 4y ago
mercury is a bad example since it is lifetime-accumulative .. my reaction to this discussion is that not enough regard is held for odd or extreme living conditions, but that the subject is actually as most critics say.. contact with water, water bodies and cool earth in some way are trivially common for a vast majority of people.. Now, working with computers specifically adds a source .. but doesnt change the above..
- nikkwong 4y agoMercury does accumulate in the body but I was more pointing out that serum mercury levels can fluctuate greatly in a relatively short period. My mom eats a ton of that tuna from costco and had blood levels far above the reference range; which dropped into the reference range 4 months after consumption cessation. She saunas and exercises; so that may have something to do with it. I agree mercury is a bad example for the reason because the actual levels of mercury burden an individual carries can be nuanced (serum + housed into organs etc). I'm not sure I follow your final sentence.
- manmal 4y agoMercury just settles down inside cells (the parts that are not eliminated), where it’s hard to detect without using a chelator. Serum levels are not a good indicator in the long term.