3 ms·
This isn't a comparison just a title and misleading bullets. Lightrun supports all these things and so much more. * Lightrun supports web UI via VSCode.dev sup
by invalidname 4y ago
This isn't a comparison just a title and misleading bullets. Lightrun supports all these things and so much more.
* Lightrun supports web UI via VSCode.dev support
* Lightrun can be installed on-prem
* It supports all these 3 platforms and .net soon
* It supports SSO and quite a few features required by fortune 100 companies
- bariskaya 4y agosorry for being misleading, I was not trying to do so. About the first one I was referring to our own web UI, considering the plugins you are right. 2. one they weren't used to ship with a 3rd party IDE afaik, that's why I've said full on-prem with web ui. don't remember saying anything about the 3rd and the 4th, and it wasn't supposed to be something offensive to our competitors
- invalidname 4y agoThe site says: > Sidekick vs Lightrun Why Choose Sidekick Which implies the following bullet points are thing that sidekick has and Lightrun doesn't. Number 3 and 4 correspond to: * Comprehensive language coverage (NodeJS, Java, Python) All supported by Lightrun * Enterprise features such as SSO, Workspace management, and more Not sure what workspace management means but Lightrun supports a wide range of enterprise features and is deployed in Fortune 100 and major security conscious enterprises.