3 ms·
To a certain extent I agree, but another argument would be that at the end of the day, computers are deterministic (even on the incredibly large scale of these
by bluehorseray 4y ago
To a certain extent I agree, but another argument would be that at the end of the day, computers are deterministic (even on the incredibly large scale of these image generators, given parameters x, it will produce y).
We're still not sure whether humans are deterministic or not. So you can't really equate the human process of art creation to a computers. Humans may still be pulling from some external inspiration that will never be within the reach of computers (I like to think that's the case).
- Verdex 4y agoI'm not sure determinism is where you want to draw the line. Just have the computer get a webcam pointed at a lava lamp. It's non-deterministic now. Or maybe you want to still argue that that's ultimately deterministic. Okay, well, just have a person show up to the art computer, look deep within their soul, then type in a completely random, soulful, non-deterministic seed value into the art computer. Bam! Now the computer can create real art.
- deleted 4y ago[deleted]