3 ms·
What should the government do? The article discusses how it is not clear what should be different (other than turning the relevant accounts back on). It is eas
by ghiculescu 4y ago
What should the government do? The article discusses how it is not clear what should be different (other than turning the relevant accounts back on).
It is easy to ask for public hearings but if there’s no intended remedy or change they will just be a show trial and nothing will change.
Your example is great, because to me it illustrates my point well. What would you like to have had be different?
- jrm4 4y agoI think good places in the past to look are "warning labels" and/or "common carrier"-like ideas. Warning labels today, I think means "fixing voluminous EULA crap," which we've done in other fields reasonably well, e.g. the FDA I think is pretty solid here. Simply requiring "readable" terms of services I think would go a long way (though you have to wait a bit for things to shake out.) The general principles behind "common carrier" type services would also be a good idea to start thinking about; they essentially just say "When your product or service becomes a day-to-day thing for a lot of people, we're going to hold you to certain accessibility rules."