"snuck" sounds ugly because it implies Google surreptitiously crawled itself into the iPad. Google implemented a combination of APIs provided by Apple. I don't

"snuck" sounds ugly because it implies Google surreptitiously crawled itself into the iPad. Google implemented a combination of APIs provided by Apple. I don't see something wrong with it, they don't appear to be breaking any rules. I would have done the same. While sharing the same foundation code is not as valuable as search + ads, Google has a positive outcome, which stems from more scrutiny and active development. In the end, it benefits both Chrome and Safari. They "sneak in" in the sense that the experience is far better with the App. To me, that makes a huge impact in user perception.