Using Zionist as a pejorative is a clear indication of personal bias, but you do you. Here's a good history of this conflict[1]. Worth a read. Labeling somet

Using Zionist as a pejorative is a clear indication of personal bias, but you do you. Here's a good history of this conflict[1]. Worth a read. Labeling something you disagree with as propaganda, when there is so much documentary evidence supporting the thing you label thusly, is not a good argumentation strategy. The arabs who were refugees were not expelled. They were not re-admitted. As the article notes, the failures of the arab leadership and their inability to come to terms and negotiate in good faith with the new political leadership has lead to 75+ years of their own diaspora. As the article notes, these were not innocent, nor victims. Their children, held in these conditions for decades, should have been resettled where they landed. If they want even a chance of returning to Israel, they should bury their sword, create a genuine peace. Amazing things would happen then. Though, given the chant is "river to sea ...", I don't expect this to occur in anyone's lifetime. The arabs launched a war of aggression. They lost. They lost the subsequent wars they launched. Their people were displaced by those wars. They aren't victims of anything but terrible leadership. Israel isn't going anywhere. [1] http://historynewsnetwork.org/article/782 http://historynewsnetwork.org/article/782