4 ms·
Given that this is supposed to be "secure management", one would expect something fail-safe, not fail-deadly. It also requires you to trust that the underlying
by ElectricalUnion 4y ago
Given that this is supposed to be "secure management", one would expect something fail-safe, not fail-deadly.
It also requires you to trust that the underlying http server/dns record server infrastructure did not change between runs of the command.
- b3morales 4y ago> It also requires you to trust that the underlying http server/dns record server infrastructure did not change And what form of distribution do you propose that is secure against that? Note also that the URL is HTTPS.