3 ms·
>I agree with your main point - law school admissions selects for completely "gameable" things that in reality is equivalent to "for the ability to game the ru
by VladRussian 15y ago
>I agree with your main point - law school admissions selects for completely "gameable" things
that in reality is equivalent to "for the ability to game the rules/system" - which seems pretty valid criteria for a law school selection
- 2arrs2ells 15y agoAgree with you 100% (and just wrote a top level comment to the same effect before I read this). That said, I think law schools would be much better off if they had an interview process & weighted it heavily. It would be easy to get a 4.0/180 and not be "client-friendly" in the least.