3 ms·

It sounds like Postgres's test coverage could be better ...

• jeltz 4y ago
  Yes, PostgreSQL needs more tests, but no it is not really a coverage issue. Most of the serious bugs have been related to concurrency or other things which simple test coverage can find. Finding these bugs is usually not trivial.
  • leaflets2 4y ago
    You meant "cannot" right: > which simple test coverage cannot find.
  • endisneigh 4y ago
    This is something foundationDB does pretty well. They built a simulator that tests such things. Doubt you could port to Postgres easily though.
    • jeltz 4y ago
      That is exactly the kind of tools PostgreSQL needs more of. There are some tools but more are needed. More plain old test coverage will not help much if at all.