i don’t understand why a country on a natural river suddenly has no right to that river. if we were to dry up a river on purpose, to prevent another country fro

i don’t understand why a country on a natural river suddenly has no right to that river. if we were to dry up a river on purpose, to prevent another country from it is an incredibly hostile act. i assume you see this climate thing as an emergency and therefore we must take extreme measures. this argument is as flawed as “chastising over-watering suburbanites”, but instead of shifting the blame from agriculture to city dwellers, you’re allowing humans to suffer in another country so you don’t have to. shame