3 ms·
Layout seems a bit odd for something seemingly targeted at programmers… eg only F1-F3, and they’re not in a standard location. Also not really a fan of compact
by TylerE 4y ago
Layout seems a bit odd for something seemingly targeted at programmers… eg only F1-F3, and they’re not in a standard location. Also not really a fan of compact arrow keys like that with no buffer space, nor the left shift not being in the first column.
What I’d really love is a version of the Microsoft Natural shape, which is the comfortable of any I’ve ever found - but of course the switches are total garbage, even by rubber dome standards.
- emrys 4y agoYeah, It's kind of odd at first sight. As all keys are programmable, so the left 8 keys(the left two columns) could be anything you want, eg F1- f8. Arrow keys are compact, it could be a problem for users prefer some buffer. For users who are familiar with ansi 60/65, that should be fine. BTW, Microsoft Natural shape is great! Love it too.