All these harmful this and unsafe that... I don't get it. What is the goal here? Are they trying to make it resistant to any "vulgar" inputs (I put "vulgar" in

All these harmful this and unsafe that... I don't get it. What is the goal here? Are they trying to make it resistant to any "vulgar" inputs (I put "vulgar" in quotes because I can 100% see how they may consider strongly political statements as "vulgar" too)? Or prevent it from producing pornography? Or CP? The last one should be fairly straightforward (kid + nudity = get it out), but the first two are very broad limitations. I understand if you want to make it not super racist, but with pornography, I'm not sure it has a point... even more so given the fact that erotic art is very common in the real world and I'm pretty sure this model (and others like it) can't distinguish between erotic art and pornography (which you can't blame it for given the legal standard seeming to be "I recognize it when I see it"), meaning it can only ever be used to produce SFW imagery scrubbed of any "risque" factors or themes, because the authors didn't want to deal with any kind of erotic art due to this impossibility of separating erotic art from pornography. If the point of all of these models is to get to something resembling an artist, then why intentionally kneecap it from the start and prevent it from producing art?