4 ms·
thanks, now I see a price attached makes a difference; else it's not "shopping", so won't show up in a shopping comparison. Yes, just making it shareware would
by 13ren 18y ago
thanks, now I see a price attached makes a difference; else it's not "shopping", so won't show up in a shopping comparison. Yes, just making it shareware would fix that.
I'd guess they'd want to keep it open source: they could dual license it - but there might be a backlash if buyers find out they could have got it free (ironically...) so perhaps some trivial glossy addition to the shareware version, so there's a sense you're getting something for your money... mail you a USB drive with it installed? (very cool). mail you a printed manual? (old skool) or, maybe include a bunch of glossy templates, by a paid pro graphic artist (I like this, because (a). digital, auto-delivery; (b). not code).
I'm assuming they're not in it for the money so it doesn't matter if they only break even (as long as it's not a hassle to provide); it's just a device to promote adoption (as you say).
- thomasmallen 18y agoThe point is you never actually ask for money. Have fine print that it's a donation if they do pay anything, but the program works perfectly with no warnings or anything of the sort, completely free. It's all a clever scheme though, and I didn't mean it in any seriousness. Now, back to my original comment, people tie prices closely to expectations as well as perceived quality.