Scientists are evaluated by how much they publish and how many times their papers are cited. There's no incentive to call others' scientists bullshit. The rank

Scientists are evaluated by how much they publish and how many times their papers are cited. There's no incentive to call others' scientists bullshit. The ranking should assign the score of a paper that was debunked to the paper that debunked it - that would provide incentive to replicating famous sketchy-looking papers.