6 ms·
I use blosxom for jamesshore.com. Although I like its simplicity, I wouldn't start with it now. I don't think it's being maintained. I've also had some performa
by jdlshore 15y ago
I use blosxom for jamesshore.com. Although I like its simplicity, I wouldn't start with it now. I don't think it's being maintained. I've also had some performance problems.
Jekyll's "static pages" approach has a lot of appeal to me, so if I were starting over I'd give it a serious look.