3 ms·
I found surprising that the author totally misses the role of financial capitalism of private bankers lending money to entrepreneurs as a catalyst of inovation.
by diego_moita 4y ago
I found surprising that the author totally misses the role of financial capitalism of private bankers lending money to entrepreneurs as a catalyst of inovation.
Both Gutenberg and James Watt themselves didn't have the money to start their ventures, they were supported and financed by their contemporary versions of venture capitalists.
This is something that was quintessential European and didn't exist in other parts of the world, from the Medici in Tuscany to the Dutch East India Company, stock markets, double entry accounting, private banks, etc.
Even within parts of Europe, the lack of financial capitalism, private bankers and the rule of the law was the main reason many regions didn't have strong manufacturing prior to late 19th century, e.g.: Spain, Portugal, Greece, etc.
- socialdemocrat 4y agoThey could not evolve manufacturing as they lacked the water situation to have waterwheel driven factories like England. They also lacked coal. Even if they had had financial capitalism it would have made no difference as they lacked the material conditions to industrialize. Another problem was lack of protestantism which held back development of reading and writing. https://medium.com/lessons-from-history/why-england-industrialized-first-d09bc797cf7f https://medium.com/lessons-from-history/why-england-industri...