"which belies the source perspective of this article as a highly libertarian perspective of the world, not an objective one. " That is the long running IWF pos

"which belies the source perspective of this article as a highly libertarian perspective of the world, not an objective one. " That is the long running IWF position, as its been a very Neo-Con oriented group since its inception. How strongly you find their arguments 'compelling' usually has less to do with objective value, but ideological compliance.