3 ms·
Do read that PG article. A simple non-emotional and non-defensive answer to the hiring manager telling him you didn't go to college, but rather did whatever el
by gleb 19y ago
Do read that PG article. A simple non-emotional and non-defensive answer to the hiring manager telling him you didn't go to college, but rather did whatever else you did would be best, IMO.
How did you spend your your time in the mid-eighties, btw? You've got me intrigued now.
- raganwald 19y agoI read that article when PG published it, and again when you mentioned it. What makes you think I gave a defensive or emotional answer to the intermediary who asked the question? I'm perfectly aware of the fact that the person asking the question either considers this piece of data of paramount importance OR they have twenty resumes on their desk that all look the same, and they're looking for an easy way to winnow the pile down to three, so even if it isn't that important, it's a way to shorten the pile. I personally doubt that they were looking at twenty nearly-identical resumes. My experience is that either of two situations hold: first, they might really believe this is the most important thing they need to know, or second, they might not be particularly skilled at identifying good candidates. Note that I am not claiming I'm a good candidate: but if I'm not worth an interview, they should be able to tell without that question, the facts are in plain view.