3 ms·
> The developer apparently wasn't interested to do it right or did not have the time, he wouldn't say Bit weird to put it like that, everyone else in the world
by vasco 4y ago
> The developer apparently wasn't interested to do it right or did not have the time, he wouldn't say
Bit weird to put it like that, everyone else in the world didn't do it either, it's open source after all.
- prokoudine 4y agoJust stating the fact. I'm fine with that. I still appreciate the effort.
- deleted 4y ago[deleted]
- hitekker 4y agoAgreed. Insinuating "other developers are careless" sounds odd given how GIMP lost their own wiki. https://gitlab.gnome.org/Infrastructure/gimp-web/-/issues/257 https://gitlab.gnome.org/Infrastructure/gimp-web/-/issues/25... Years of docs gone because one unnamed maintainer forgot to update hosting. With no backups. The official roadmap https://wiki.gimp.org/wiki/Roadmap#GIMP_3.0 https://wiki.gimp.org/wiki/Roadmap#GIMP_3.0 has been inaccessible for 3 months, which the blog glosses over as no big deal. This kind of amateurism is uncommon to Blender and Krita but rather common to GIMP; some of their maintainers have even been banned from twitter.
- prokoudine 4y ago> Insinuating "other developers are careless" OMG, nope. The person in a parent thread asked a very specific question: what's tricky about CMYK support and why it didn't come earlier. How can I answer that without explaining that CMYK exporting almost happened years before and saying what went wrong there? Of course, it's your choice to think the worst of people. > some of their maintainers have even been banned from twitter. Are you referring to me?