3 ms·
> Companies don’t need an alternative to Adobe. The licensing costs are a drop in the bucket. You are ignoring non-profits and countries foreign to you.
by Eduard 4y ago
> Companies don’t need an alternative to Adobe. The licensing costs are a drop in the bucket.
You are ignoring non-profits and countries foreign to you.
- dagmx 4y agoNo I’m not because Adobe has pricing structures for non-profits and other markets. In the context of this discussion, the question was why companies aren’t funding GIMP development, and the ones that can’t afford a $20/mo aren’t the ones who would be funding development anyway. Yes, of course there’s a market for free stuff. But the price of admission into the existing paid for products is low enough that there’s little motivation to fund it.