4 ms·
> it was clear from the post you challenged that the criticism was about lack of new ideas and commentary especially that countering safe narratives Not sure w
by chrisseaton 4y ago
> it was clear from the post you challenged that the criticism was about lack of new ideas and commentary especially that countering safe narratives
Not sure what thread you were reading - the one I responded to said it was impossible in general to get anything new published. You can see hundreds (thousands) of new published works every year. They moved the goalposts by then saying that they only consider publishing to mean critical work.
- 5560675260 4y agoReread first two sentences of the post that started this thread. They clearly state that books are being published and what goes into getting those books published. This wasn't about what OP "considers publishing to mean", it's what OP considers to be worth being read.
- yywwbbn 4y agoIf any newly published book is by definition not worthy enough to be read, according to OP. It’s really possible to prove he’s wrong. Is it?