3 ms·
That would exclude the worst offenders. But it doesn't solve the incentive problem of tragedy of the commons. Once people have paid $1, that's immediately a sun
by hackerlight 4y ago
That would exclude the worst offenders. But it doesn't solve the incentive problem of tragedy of the commons. Once people have paid $1, that's immediately a sunk cost, and from then people have no reason (aside from morals, which are absent in some people) not to shit on the toilet seat and walk out. But it still may be an alright solution (when combined with regular cleaners), even if it isn't a perfect one.
- withinboredom 4y agoHere, you get a voucher that you can use to get your money back and can use it in the business the bathroom is located in, or in one of the nearby businesses.
- idontwantthis 4y agoThe dollar is used to pay for cleaning and attendance. This is an existing system. The US used to do it.
- hackerlight 4y agoThat's how it's funded. The incentives to not leave a mess remain unchanged. All you've done is filter out some % of people who would have otherwise left a mess, as well as some % of people who wouldn't have. I mean, maybe paying for it makes people be more careful because of some psychological reasons... possibly.