3 ms·
At many users' hourly rates, it's cheaper to just buy Photoshop. OSS is only successful with a real business model.
by Hydraulix989 4y ago
At many users' hourly rates, it's cheaper to just buy Photoshop. OSS is only successful with a real business model.
- kome 4y agoWith this mentality, FOSS wouldn't even exist. But it does, and modern computing is based on it. So, your mentality might have some problems.
- frankchn 4y agoYou can get paid to work on FOSS though. Google, Intel, etc… employees contributes to lots of FOSS as part of their jobs.
- Hydraulix989 4y agoDo explain more. My mentality is that FOSS exists and has thrived through viable business models. Very few people just do charitable OSS work without deriving any benefits from it. Those that do, don't end up lasting very long: https://www.theregister.com/2020/01/21/rust_actix_web_framework_maintainer_quits/ https://www.theregister.com/2020/01/21/rust_actix_web_framew... https://web.archive.org/web/20110707151924/http://apcmag.com/why_i_quit_kernel_developer_con_kolivas.htm https://web.archive.org/web/20110707151924/http://apcmag.com...
- ekianjo 4y agoits the wrong way to look at it. when you implement things in FOSS a lot more people have access to that feature.
- nine_k 4y agoYou don't usually personally contribute major things to OSS because it's a shrewd business move, but because you want it to exist, you want to share, and you reasonably enjoy the process. (Corporations pouring paid hours into Linux, Blender, Postgres, etc are a different case.)
- Hydraulix989 4y agoInteresting how your "different case" is the one with by far the most successful OSS projects...
- nine_k 4y agoCases of paid and unpaid labor are materilly different, even if they contribute to an open-source project.
- pedro2 4y agoYou don’t have (unpaid) hobbies??