3 ms·

I meant a modern GUI oriented OS that's stable (see glibc 2.36 breaking EAC and other apps*) and nice to develop for. Compatibility with Windows or POSIX would

by Ygg2 4y ago

I meant a modern GUI oriented OS that's stable (see glibc 2.36 breaking EAC and other apps*) and nice to develop for. Compatibility with Windows or POSIX would be amazing but not required. * Yeah, I get it. Changing from `DT_HASH` to `DT_GNU_HASH` had to happen at some point. Backwards compatibility is a real chore, and not what glibc maintainers bound themselves to.

shakna 4y ago
Whilst it's not particular nice to develop for, Android sits on the Linux kernel. I haven't heard any convincing argument not to consider Android a "Linux for the desktop", in the sense of mass adoption and people using it as their everyday device.