3 ms·
> Can you please point to the exact time in the video where he mentions multiple tries? I was referring to what you wrote. You said that there's no reason that
by al_mandi 4y ago
> Can you please point to the exact time in the video where he mentions multiple tries?
I was referring to what you wrote. You said that there's no reason that there weren't multiple tries to get the universe just right to support life. I'm saying that's a metaphysical claim you just made, which is outside the realm of science, which is the point the presenter was making.
- eis 4y agoI can actually use his own logic to prove the opposite point of his claim. Since his reasoning only works if there was one (or very few) tries wouldn't it be very unlikely to have had few tries compared to a much high number of possibly inifite tries? That means his case is in fact the unlikely case (few tries and hence likely design). What I am saying is that we have no reason to assume and certainly no proof for ANY number of tries so we can't deduce what he claims. But if you follow his reasoning then he actually would need to come to the opposite conclusion that he came to. I am not making the metaphysical claim, he is making it. I am only showing that his own logic works against him. Anyone who claims god exists is in the realm of metaphysical.
- al_mandi 4y ago> What I am saying is that we have no reason to assume and certainly no proof for ANY number of tries Who made the tries?