3 ms·
The second half of the sentence that you stopped short of quoting in full explains that no reason is required for a motion of no confidence. It was added solely
by FPGAhacker 4y ago
The second half of the sentence that you stopped short of quoting in full explains that no reason is required for a motion of no confidence. It was added solely as a prod.
- CamperBob2 4y agoYeah, I keep forgetting how judges in civil suits, such as the one that would inevitably follow shenanigans like this, are easy to fool by citing technicalities, especially ones that don't exist or that "aren't necessary." My bad.
- deleted 4y ago[deleted]