4 ms·
> People have to realize that most, if not all authority is naturally opposed to progress. That is absolutely true, but as the people in power get younger, the
by waqf 15y ago
> People have to realize that most, if not all authority is naturally opposed to progress.
That is absolutely true, but as the people in power get younger, their reference point for what counts as "progress" advances. Politicians who grew up in the iPad era will be reactionaries against some as-yet-unconceived-of technological or social change, not against iPads.
- dantheman 15y agoI'd have to disagree, we had multiple presidents who were drug users; the hippies are in power now, and the war on drugs marches on.
- doron 15y agoThey smoke, but don't inhale.
- roc 15y agoThat was yester-year's white lie. Since then Marion Barry was re-elected as mayor of DC. GWB admitted not only to use, but substance abuse. Obama not only admitted to using pot and cocaine, but cracked a joke about the silliness of Clinton's dodge. Using drugs is simply another thing that the ruling class openly admits to doing and doesn't suffer notably for, while they throw the book at any other citizen for doing the same, or less. e.g. dodging taxes, soliciting prostitutes, cheating on their spouses, not paying child support, hiring illegal immigrants and maybe even covering up the odd mysterious death.
- Djehngo 15y agoBecause politicians will largely enact policies which enable them to be re-elected. I don't know the specifics but I strongly suspect that coming out against the war on drugs will lose them more support than it would gain them. Support in terms of some mix of votes, finance, influence and connections. If this was un-true then some politician would have realised that standing for legalisation would win them an election and would have done so by now.
- slowpoke 15y ago>but as the people in power get younger Except they aren't. If at all, they will be getting older. But anyways, age doesn't really matter. Neither does understanding of the current technology. It's the fact that we allow corporations to buy out the government, and continuously run away from responsibility by telling us that 'things are surely going to change in x years / with the next election'. It's highly delusional. If we want to change something, we can't wait for some authority (usually the government) to solve our problems. We've got to do it ourselves. With or without its consent, and - if required - against it. This resolution is the catalyst for everything else.